Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma said that she was not issuing formal notice in the case.
The Court asked the WFI counsel to obtain instructions by September 29, when the matter will be heard next.
Phogat’s case is that the two notices issued to her on May 9 and June 17 are part of a continuing pattern of arbitrary and mala fide action by WFI that has obstructed her return to competitive wrestling after maternity.
She has argued that WFI acted against her despite the International Testing Agency having cleared her to compete from January 1, 2026.
“The show cause notices and consequential proceedings constitute a continuing impediment consequential proceedings constitute a continuing impediment to the petitioner’s return to elite competition and have the to the petitioner’s return to elite competition and have the potential to prejudice her eligibility, nomination and potential to prejudice her eligibility, nomination and participation in forthcoming competitions,” Phogat stated in her plea.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma said that she was not issuing formal notice in the case. The Court asked the WFI counsel to obtain instructions by September 29, when the matter will be heard next.
Phogat’s case is that the two notices issued to her on May 9 and June 17 are part of a continuing pattern of arbitrary and mala fide action by WFI that has obstructed her return to competitive wrestling after maternity.
She has argued that WFI acted against her despite the International Testing Agency having cleared her to compete from January 1, 2026.
“The show cause notices and consequential proceedings constitute a continuing impediment consequential proceedings constitute a continuing impediment to the petitioner’s return to elite competition and have the to the petitioner’s return to elite competition and have the potential to prejudice her eligibility, nomination and potential to prejudice her eligibility, nomination and participation in forthcoming competitions,” Phogat stated in her plea.
