Justice Madhu Jain allowed a plea by IRS officer Ashok Kumar Aggarwal and directed the Special Judge (CBI) to file a written complaint against CBI officials Sushil Dewan, Vineet Vinayak, Amit Kumar, Raman Tyagi, Prem Kumar Gautam and Md Azad.
The Court said that there is a “reasonable foundation” in allegations made against these officials for the offences under Section 191 (giving false evidence), 193 (punishment for giving or fabricating false evidence) and 209 (punishment for fraudulently or dishonestly making false claim in court) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
“The learned Special Judge is hereby directed to make a complaint in writing against Sushil Dewan, Vineet Vinayak, Amit Kumar, Raman Tyagi, Prem Kumar Gautam and Md.
Azad for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 191 read with Section 193 IPC and Section 209 IPC, and to transmit the same to the concerned jurisdictional Magistrate within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this judgment,” the High Court said in its October 6 order.
Justice Madhu Jain allowed a plea by IRS officer Ashok Kumar Aggarwal and directed the Special Judge (CBI) to file a written complaint against CBI officials Sushil Dewan, Vineet Vinayak, Amit Kumar, Raman Tyagi, Prem Kumar Gautam and Md Azad.
The Court said that there is a “reasonable foundation” in allegations made against these officials for the offences under Section 191 (giving false evidence), 193 (punishment for giving or fabricating false evidence) and 209 (punishment for fraudulently or dishonestly making false claim in court) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
“The learned Special Judge is hereby directed to make a complaint in writing against Sushil Dewan, Vineet Vinayak, Amit Kumar, Raman Tyagi, Prem Kumar Gautam and Md. Azad for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 191 read with Section 193 IPC and Section 209 IPC, and to transmit the same to the concerned jurisdictional Magistrate within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this judgment,” the High Court said in its October 6 order.
