At the same time, financial professionals have offered sharply different interpretations, ranging from tax-driven strategies to deeply unusual portfolio behaviour.
CBS News organised the scanned filing into its most complete public picture so far of the president’s trading activity.
The most common trade sizes fell between $15,001 and $50,000, including 998 purchases and 393 sales in that band.
Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Netflix, Oracle and AMD appeared most frequently in the disclosure, with between 17 and 22 trades each.
On April 7, after the disclosure period, President Trump posted on Truth Social praising the company, writing: “Palantir Technologies (PLTR) has proven to have great war fighting capabilities and equipment.
Live Events
as a Reliable and Trusted News Source Addas a Reliable and Trusted News Source Add Now!
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
A torrent of trades, running into the thousands, has placed US President Donald Trump ’s recent investment activity under a bright political and financial spotlight. Between January and March this year, his accounts moved through stocks and funds at a feverish pace, more typical of a large institutional desk than a personal portfolio, an analysis by CBS News has revealed. Tech giants, ETFs and major consumer names repeatedly appeared in buy and sell orders, often in rapid clusters across single days. Some of the heaviest bursts of activity came just as markets and policy conversations were shifting in the background, adding to questions about timing and intent.The scale alone has drawn attention in Washington, where lawmakers and ethics experts are debating what such constant trading means for a sitting president. At the same time, financial professionals have offered sharply different interpretations, ranging from tax-driven strategies to deeply unusual portfolio behaviour. However, the Trump Organization says that the president has no direct role in managing these trades.Below is an account of how CBS News broke down this extraordinary flow of transactions using the president’s latest financial disclosure.CBS News reports that Trump ’s investment accounts traded between $212 million and $695 million in securities between January 6 and March 30, 2026. Within that period, there were 3,642 total transactions across 1,026 companies and funds. The breakdown includes 2,346 purchases and 1,296 sales.Also read | Sarvam rises: India begins to find its own opening after US slams the tech door shut The disclosure form, known as an OGE Form 278-T, was signed on May 8 and covers transactions that must be reported within 45 days under federal ethics rules. CBS News organised the scanned filing into its most complete public picture so far of the president’s trading activity. The most common trade sizes fell between $15,001 and $50,000, including 998 purchases and 393 sales in that band. At the top end, four sales fell into the $5,000,001 to $25 million range and involved Amazon, Meta, Microsoft and a Vanguard ETF.CBS News found that technology companies dominated the trading activity. Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Netflix, Oracle and AMD appeared most frequently in the disclosure, with between 17 and 22 trades each. Overall, tech firms accounted for at least $43 million in purchases and $24 million in sales, making them the most heavily traded sector.The report shows activity spread across 11 sectors using Yahoo Finance classifications, along with additional categories for ETFs, funds and unclassified transactions. After technology, the most active sectors included financial, consumer, industrial and healthcare companies. In total, stock purchases were valued between $126 million and $399 million, while sales ranged from $86 million to $296 million.CBS News identified notable spikes in trading volume in February and March. On February 10, the accounts sold large amounts of Microsoft, Amazon and Meta, each transaction valued between $5 million and $25 million. This date stands out as one of the largest concentrated selling days in the filing.March saw a sharp increase in buying activity. The accounts made 1,565 purchases in March alone compared to roughly 400 buys in each of the previous two months. On March 23, there were 283 purchases and 17 sales in a single day, making it the busiest trading day in the dataset.Also read | How Iran war reordered India's foreign trade map in a major way CBS also notes that earlier disclosures showed far less activity. A January filing covering the last two months of 2025 included just 191 transactions, mostly in municipal and corporate bonds. That makes the jump to 3,642 transactions in the latest filing especially pronounced.Some of the most scrutinized trades involve timing around policy decisions or public statements. CBS News reports that on January 6, the accounts bought between $500,001 and $1,000,000 worth of Nvidia stock. This was the first of 15 Nvidia-related transactions during the period, including nine purchases and six sales. The following week, the administration relaxed export controls on Nvidia’s AI chips, allowing expanded sales to China.The accounts also purchased hundreds of thousands of dollars in Palantir stock during March. On April 7, after the disclosure period, President Trump posted on Truth Social praising the company, writing: “Palantir Technologies (PLTR) has proven to have great war fighting capabilities and equipment. Just ask our enemies!!! President DJT”CBS further reports that the accounts bought stock in Eli Lilly, with timing that coincided with what KFF Health News described as “several favorable government decisions benefiting the drugmaker's GLP-1 business.” The total Eli Lilly purchases reached as much as $730,000 in the quarter.These overlaps have fuelled concerns among critics about whether public actions and private financial activity may be intersecting, even indirectly.The trading activity has drawn scrutiny from lawmakers and ethics experts. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts has called for an investigation into what she described as “potential insider trading.” At a Senate hearing, she pointed specifically to Nvidia trades and said the president “is enriching himself by taking advantage of his position.” She also pressed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to investigate.CBS reports that ethics experts note that presidents are exempt from some conflict of interest rules that apply to other federal officials. However, they warn that holding active investments can still raise concerns. Richard Briffault, a Columbia Law School professor, said the structure creates risks because “he is in a position to make all kinds of decisions that can affect stock prices” including public statements.Briffault also said the lack of a blind trust matters. “He must know or he could know what his holdings are, and he could know how his actions and statements affect them,” he said, adding that there is no independent monitor.CBS News consulted investment professionals who reviewed the data and offered competing explanations. One portfolio manager, David Salem of Hedgeye Asset Management, said the pattern likely reflects “classic tax-loss harvesting activity,” where losses are used to offset gains. He also suggested the strategy resembled “direct indexing,” where managers mimic index funds by trading individual securities.Salem said modern systems can automate this kind of activity and that it is often used by high-net-worth clients to reduce taxes. He also pointed to March 23 as evidence, linking the surge in activity to index rebalancing by major providers like the S&P 500 and FTSE. He described it as consistent with tax-efficient automated strategies and said he saw no evidence of insider trading, while noting “I can't prove a negative.”Another adviser, Eric Diton of The Wealth Alliance, expressed skepticism about the scale. He said, "I can't come up with a rationale for that amount of trading for anyone. Even if people were trying to pin him for … trading on information, you still wouldn't trade thousands of times. There's not enough information swirling to trade that many times.""It's also tax inefficient. If the goal is maybe to create short-term losses, again, I have not seen a strategy that would warrant that kind of trading, ever," he added. "I build my life on giving advice and giving explanation. I truly can't explain it. It makes no sense to me. Maybe there is some sophisticated trade out there for tax purchases, I've never seen a strategy out there that would warrant that amount of trading. Thousands of trades in a quarter."Diton concluded: "I don't think the president can sit there and day trade. To do thousands of trades in a quarter, that's a full-time job and then some."The Trump Organization rejected suggestions that the president is involved in managing investments. It said, “Neither President Trump, his family, nor The Trump Organization plays any role in selecting, directing, or approving specific investments.” It also stated, “They receive no advance notice of trading activity and provide no input regarding investment decisions or portfolio management.” The statement said the arrangement is designed to separate the president from investment decisions and avoid conflicts of interest.CBS News notes that stock trading by a sitting president is not illegal. Presidents are also exempt from a major conflict of interest law that applies to other federal officials. However, the practice has drawn growing criticism from ethics advocates and members of Congress. Briffault said most modern presidents use blind trusts or diversified funds to avoid even the appearance of conflicts. In contrast, Trump’s structure relies on outside managers without full blind trust restrictions.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent defended the administration in a Senate exchange, saying the president was not personally engaged in high-frequency trading and that “clearly, he had an outside manager who was doing that.”Senator Andy Kim has proposed legislation that would ban stock trading for officials across all three branches of government. Another bipartisan proposal, the HONEST Act sponsored by Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri, would ban trading by members of Congress and future presidents and vice presidents. Trump criticized Hawley on Truth Social in 2025, writing: “I don't think real Republicans want to see their President, who has had unprecedented success, TARGETED, because of the 'whims' of a second-tier Senator named Josh Hawley.” Hawley has continued to support the idea of a ban but noted that his proposal would not affect the current president, saying it would take effect in 2029.
