Per reporting by The Next Web and Ars Technica, the preprint repository arXiv will impose a one-year ban on authors whose submissions contain "incontrovertible evidence" of unvetted large-language-model output, according to a social-media thread by Thomas Dietterich, chair of arXiv's computer science section (The Next Web; Ars Technica).
Those reports also say that after the one-year ban, all future submissions from the affected authors must first be accepted by a peer-reviewed journal before arXiv will host them (Ars Technica; The Next Web).
The enforcement is described as targeting clear signs of careless AI use, including hallucinated references, leftover chatbot instructions, and fabricated data or tables (The Next Web).
Ars Technica reported that a person involved with arXiv described the policy on social media while the platform itself had not yet provided a public statement to that outlet.
Per reporting by The Next Web and Ars Technica, the preprint repository arXiv will impose a one-year ban on authors whose submissions contain "incontrovertible evidence" of unvetted large-language-model output, according to a social-media thread by Thomas Dietterich, chair of arXiv's computer science section (The Next Web; Ars Technica). Those reports also say that after the one-year ban, all future submissions from the affected authors must first be accepted by a peer-reviewed journal before arXiv will host them (Ars Technica; The Next Web). The enforcement is described as targeting clear signs of careless AI use, including hallucinated references, leftover chatbot instructions, and fabricated data or tables (The Next Web). Ars Technica reported that a person involved with arXiv described the policy on social media while the platform itself had not yet provided a public statement to that outlet.
