The applications have been moved in the revision plea filed by the CBI against the trial court's order of February 27, 2026.
They raise preliminary objections to the maintainability of CBI's case.
It has been argued that the revision petition does not point out any specific illegality/discrepancies in the trial court judgement.
That CBI has also failed to produce any evidence, material or documents with the present Revision Petition to show the perversity in the order of discharge," Sisodia said in his application.
The applications are likely to come up for hearing before Justice Manoj Jain on August 18.
The applications have been moved in the revision plea filed by the CBI against the trial court's order of February 27, 2026. They raise preliminary objections to the maintainability of CBI's case.
One of the grounds raised by Kejriwal and Sisodia is that the revision plea was filed within 4 hours of the trial court judgment with "unprecedented haste" and in the "most unserious manner". It has been argued that the revision petition does not point out any specific illegality/discrepancies in the trial court judgement.
"That the present omnibus CBI petition failed to even plead- against each accused person specifically - as to how the discharge order is an order passed without any evidence or that material evidence is ignored qua the specific accused or which finding -in which para- for which accused- amounts to judicial discretion is exercised arbitrarily or perversely. That CBI has also failed to produce any evidence, material or documents with the present Revision Petition to show the perversity in the order of discharge," Sisodia said in his application.
Further, it has been stated that due to filing of such "bare-shell, omnibus and non-specific petition", prejudice is being caused to the respondents as they are unable to discern the case they have to meet.
The applications are likely to come up for hearing before Justice Manoj Jain on August 18.
