AI representation of a sea AmphibianGerrothorax maritimusNature Ecology & EvolutionWhat did the ancient marine amphibian look like?
credit: Ryosuke motani (by BBC Wildlife Magazine)Gerrothorax maritimusWhy is finding an amphibian living entirely at sea so unusual?
Gerrothorax maritimusHow did scientists establish that it lived in the sea?
But what if an amphibian once lived entirely in the sea?
This has long made a fully marine amphibian seem unlikely.However, researchers believemay have overcome this limitation through its unusual body structure.
AI representation of a sea Amphibian
Gerrothorax maritimus
Nature Ecology & Evolution
What did the ancient marine amphibian look like?
credit: Ryosuke motani (by BBC Wildlife Magazine)
Gerrothorax maritimus
Why is finding an amphibian living entirely at sea so unusual?
Gerrothorax maritimus
How did scientists establish that it lived in the sea?
Credit: Ryosuke Motani (by BBC Wildlife magazine)
Gerrothorax maritimus
Gerrothorax pulcherrimus
Whenever we think of amphibians, we usually picture animals that live both on land and in water, such as frogs, salamanders and newts. Their ability to survive in both environments is one of the defining features of the group. But what if an amphibian once lived entirely in the sea? A newly described fossil from China may offer evidence of just that. Dating back around 237 million years, the armoured creature measured approximately 2.4 feet in length and could challenge what scientists have long understood about amphibian evolution.The newly identified species, named, lived during the Late Triassic period. Researchers examined two nearly complete fossilised skeletons discovered in what is now China's Guizhou Province, an area that was once covered by the sea. The findings, published in the journal, provide the first fossil evidence of a stem amphibian that may have lived entirely in a marine environment.Unlike the amphibians we are familiar with today,had a flattened, disc-shaped body covered in layers of bony armour. Measuring around 74 centimetres, or approximately 2.4 feet, it was roughly the size of a large salamander. Its broad body and protective covering made it quite different from modern amphibians, which generally have soft, permeable skin.Researchers believe the animal was a bottom-dwelling creature that lived close to the seabed.Its broad head and mouth, along with its small conical teeth, suggest that it may have fed by sucking in smaller animals that passed nearby. The armour may also have offered protection against predators, including large marine reptiles such as ichthyosaurs, whose fossils have been found in the same region.One of the biggest reasons this discovery is interesting is that amphibians are generally not suited to living in saltwater. Unlike reptiles, birds and mammals, most amphibians have highly permeable skin that allows them to absorb water and exchange gases with their surroundings. While this works well in freshwater environments, exposure to seawater can cause them to lose water through their skin, leading to dehydration.Even among the more than 8,000 living amphibian species, none is known to live entirely in a marine environment. Some, such as the crab-eating frog, can tolerate a certain amount of saltwater exposure, but they still need access to freshwater to recover. This has long made a fully marine amphibian seem unlikely.However, researchers believemay have overcome this limitation through its unusual body structure. Its extensive bony armour could have restricted the movement of water and salts through its skin, reducing its dependence on the usual amphibian method of absorbing water. Instead, it may have relied more heavily on its mouth and digestive system to take in water, while its gills helped regulate salt levelsThe researchers did not rely on the location of the fossils alone. Both skeletons were found in deep-sea sediments, hundreds of miles from major landmasses that existed during the Late Triassic period. Their relatively complete condition was also important. The researchers suggest that the animals probably died close to where they lived, rather than being carried into the sea after death, as their skeletons still preserved delicate parts such as the fingers.The team also conducted geochemical tests on the fossils, examining the proportions of different strontium isotopes preserved in the bones. Strontium isotope ratios can provide clues about the environment in which an animal lived. In this case, the results closely matched the composition of seawater from the Late Triassic period, supporting the idea that these amphibians grew up in the ocean rather than simply ending up there by accident.The researchers believedescended from a lineage of amphibians that already possessed extensive body armour but lived in freshwater environments. Its close relative,, also had a flattened body and bony covering, but was not known to have lived in the sea.This raises an interesting possibility: features that originally evolved for protection may have eventually helped some members of the group adapt to an entirely different environment. The armour may have reduced the problems associated with saltwater exposure, allowing the animal to survive in conditions that would be difficult for most amphibians today.The discovery actually reminds us there are so many mysteries yet to be unwound. It shows that their evolutionary history may have been more varied than scientists previously understood. It also offers another example of how evolution can repurpose existing features, sometimes allowing animals to occupy environments that once seemed impossible for their ancestors.
